What's New Upcoming Events Organizations Research Practice PolicyHome

National Center for Fathering

Gaining Knowledge About Teen Dads:
The Orlando Teen Fathering Project

Ken Canfield, Ph.D.
October 1997

The Community Foundation of Central Florida, Inc., and the National Center for Fathering (NCF) collaborated on a project in 1997 to identify the needs and attitudes of teen-age fathers. The project was a response to a grant from the Danforth Foundation to encourage local community initiatives to promote and encourage responsible fathering.

Following a literature review, NCF developed an assessment survey to obtain quantitative measures on the status of teen fathers. Based on existing data, NCF developed scales [sets of questions] in eight areas: Acquisition and development of parenting skills, Family of origin issues, Emotional maturity and bonding with the baby, Educational and job opportunities, Relationship with baby's mother/father, Family supports, Self-esteem and Legal and paternity issues (see appendix, Jan. 8, 1997 memo from Ken Canfield).

Diane Sandquist and Nancy Peed met with an advisory committee representing a number of Orlando-area agencies working in the field. The committee carefully evaluated each question. Questions were selected for each scale and the focus of some scales were refined. NCF proceeded to construct an initial draft from these recommendations. This draft was revised (see appendix, Young Parenting Survey - Draft I), and then tested by the NCF on teen-age parents in the Kansas City area. After further committee review, the final survey was pared to 32 questions (two of which, nos. 31 and 32, had a substantial number of sub-questions). The final survey instrument (See appendix, untitled survey instrument headed with "Directions" box) was condensed to fit on the back and front of a sheet of paper. The instrument focused on seven scales, as well as specific obstacles to a teen-age dad's involvement in his child's life and methods of discipline in his family of origin and a number of demographic variables. The seven scales were: Parent-child interaction, Family of origin feelings, Relationship to other parent, Extended family support, Parental feelings, Friends and support and rejection.

A pretest of the instrument (n = 87) showed the statistical reliability of each of these scales. Five of the seven scales had Cronbach's coefficient alphas of .81 or better (see appendix, Survey Scales). Only one (The "Social/Skill Support" scale at .7167) fell below 0.75.

The Community Foundation administered surveys to teen-age parents and their partners during April-May 1997 (n = 204). Because of the difficulty of reaching teen age dads, as well as for the additional insight provided, moms were also included in the survey. Data was analyzed by the NCF using SPSS software.

RESULTS

For complete results on each question, broken down by male/female and employed/unemployed, see appendix "The Orlando Teen Fathering Project - Spring 1997 Survey Results." The gender mix included 58 males and 144 females (2 no response).

General Demographics

An early challenge in any project like this is defining "teen dad." For purposes of this survey, dads who were partners of teen moms were included. As other literature has reported, many partners of teen moms are older, sometimes considerably older. (PPT (Pregnant and Parenting Teens) Express, Vol. 5:2, Summer 1995, p. 4, reported on 1990 records from the California Vital Statistics Section showing 74 percent of the fathers of children born to school-age mothers were age 19 or older at the time of conception.) 61 of the respondents to the survey were 20 and older. The range for all respondents was from 13 to 38, with the median being 18.





Family of Origin Issues

There was a dramatic difference in reports on the feelings of respondents' fathers and mothers. For the sample as a whole, only 48.6% could "strongly agree" that "My father likes me," while 74.0% strongly agreed "My mother likes me." Interestingly, both genders showed a slight drop from the overall average for the same gender parent. Only 72.3% of females could only "strongly agree" that "My mother likes me." Only 46.0% of males could agree with the same statement about their father. Although there was no specific question about father absence in the sample, other questions suggest a substantial number experienced this. Father absence was suggested in part by a 20 point gap between "My father likes me" and the response to the question, "The person I spent most of my growing-up time with likes me." 69.3% of all respondents strongly agreed with this statement, with a nearly even gender division. The only respondents to disagree with this statement: "I like the person(s) that I spent my growing-up time with" were unemployed females.


Self Esteem

All four questions dealing with self-esteem and rejection issues were among the ten statements with the greatest variance, and can be termed "marker items." The four questions were:

-- I struggle with shame and rejection. -- 15.4% agreement among males
-- I feel abandoned by my family and friends. -- 17.0% agreement among males
-- My parents criticize me often -- 27.3% agreement among males
-- Many of my childhood memories are painful. -- 31.8% agreement among males
(Agreement combines both "agree" and "strongly agree" responses)

Social/Skill Support

One of the five questions in this scale was a "marker item." Those in strongest agreement on that question were males and those who were employed:
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree Agree Strongly
Agree
I have friends whom I can call on to help me through a difficult situation. 2.0 15.9 40.3 41.8
MALE 1.8 14.0 38.6 45.6
FEMALE 2.3 16.1 41.3 40.6
EMPLOYED 1.1 11.4 44.3 43.2
UNEMPLOYED 2.8 18.9 36.8 41.5

One statement which revealed a small core of people in despair was this statement: "I am hopeful about my future." 7.1% of the male respondents strongly disagreed with this statement, and interestingly, 3.4% of the respondents who were employed strongly disagreed as well.

Extended Family Support

Male respondents were slightly more confident of relatives' support than friends' support.


Relationship to Other Parent

Another marker item, showing distinct differences within the sample, was this statement "I have discussed plans I have for my child with the child's other parent." Here the gradations of "strongly agree" as opposed to "agree" may be of particular interest in revealing gender differences.


Although only 3.0% of the sample disagreed in any way with the statement "My current girlfriend/boyfriend likes my child," more than twice that number, 7.5%, reported "I have a new boyfriend or girlfriend" as a problem in seeing the child. 7.6% reported that the other parent having a new boyfriend or girlfriend was a problem in seeing the child.

Parental Feelings

Three question from the scale also emerged as "marker items."
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree Agree Strongly
Agree
I am often depressed since becoming a parent. 36.2 34.1 25.4 4.3
MALE 45.8 29.2 16.7 8.3
FEMALE 33.1 36.0 27.9 2.9
FEMALE 33.1 36.0 27.9 2.9
EMPLOYED 39.0 32.5 24.7 3.9
UNEMPLOYED 36.6 35.6 23.8 4.0
I am afraid that I will not be a good parent. 46.2 36.0 14.7 3.7
MALE 49.1 36.4 10.9 3.6
FEMALE 44.7 36.2 14.2 5.0
EMPLOYED 42.4 41.2 14.1 2.4
UNEMPLOYED 49.5 31.4 12.4 6.7
I have had a hard time keeping my mind on school work since I have had a child. 20.9 34.0 30.1 15.0
MALE 26.3 31.6 18.4 23.7
FEMALE 18.4 35.1 34.2 12.3
EMPLOYED 19.7 37.7 23.0 19.7
UNEMPLOYED 20.9 31.4 34.9 12.8

(This last question had high "Does not apply" answers, since many aren't in school.)

Parent-Child Interaction

As might be expected, females were significantly higher in agreeing with three of the statements from this scale.


Obstacles to Parent-Child Interaction

Some gender differences emerged where asked about obstacles to parent-child interaction:

Top Five Obstacles "Often" A Problem
Obstacle MALES Obstacle FEMALES
Work schedule 23.1% Work schedule 5.3%
No money 11.5% No transportation 3.8%
No money 11.5% No transportation 3.8%
No transportation 7.8% No money 3.7%
My family/other parent's family 7.7% School schedule 3.0%
Don't want to see child 5.9% Personal problems
(tie) Don't have time
2.3%
Top Five Obstacles "Sometimes" or "Often" A Problem
Obstacle MALES Obstacle FEMALES
Work schedule 48.1% Work schedule 36.4%
Personal Problems 34.6% School schedule 30.3%
No transportation 33.3% No money 13.3%
No money 32.7% Personal problems 11.3%
Don't have time 26.9% No transportation 9.8%

The statement "Don't know what to with child" drew a similar response from males and females. Among the overall sample 1.6% said it was "Often" a problem, and 9.8% "Sometimes" a problem. The difference between males and females was 0.3 on "Often" and "0.4" on "Sometimes." Since this is one obstacle which could be impacted by training for mothers and fathers, the response is fascinating since it indicates an equal need among both sexes.

Methods of Discipline in Family of Origin

When asked "How were you disciplined when you were growing up?" these patterns emerged. Among the overall sample being "Talked to" was just barely the most common form used "Sometimes" or "Often" while the respondent was growing up. Being "Talked to" was followed by being "Spanked," "Restricted privileges," and "Being yelled at." All four of these methods were closely clustered together in the percentage responding "Sometimes" or "Often."

These methods were followed at some distance by "Sent to room," and "Extra chores." Respondents saw a distinction between being "Hit or slapped," and being "Spanked" as 41.6% said they were "Never" hit or slapped, while only 14.1% said they were "Never" spanked.

There were a couple of gender distinctives. Females were more likely to be "Ignored" (31.3% mentions by females versus 25% mentions by males) or "Yelled at" (88.1% to 76.8% for males). Males on the other hand were much more likely to be "Sent out of the house" (28.1% mentions by males versus 14.6% for females). They were also slightly more likely to report being given "Extra chores" (70.9% for males to 64.6% for females) and being "Sent to room" (80.3% mentions by males versus 76.9% for females).


ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION

The data was subjected to a wide variety of tests (T-tests, Cluster Analysis and Path Analysis). The "marker items" referred to earlier were identified through this analysis. These are the items which demonstrated the greatest ability to distinguish between groups. Those items were:

-- I have had a hard time keeping my mind on school work since I have had a child.

-- I am often depressed since becoming a parent.

-- I need to see my child more.

-- I have discussed the plan I have for my child with the child's other parent.

-- I struggle with shame and rejection.

-- I am afraid that I will not be a good parent.

-- I have friends whom I can call on to help me through a difficult situation.

-- I feel abandoned by my family and friends.

-- Many of my childhood memories are painful.

-- My parents criticize me often.

Females were significantly higher in four items:

A. I talk to my child.

B. I tell my child that I love him/her.

C. I play with my child.

D. I have received a call or letter from some of my family since becoming a parent.

Males were significantly higher "I need to see my child more often."

Four Types of Teen Dads

In a Cluster Analysis which tested five scale scores (parent-child interaction, extended family support, parental feelings, self-esteem and social/skill support) four types of teen dads emerged from the sample:

A. 23% reported good extended family support, high parental confidence, high self-esteem, good parent-child interaction and moderate social/skill support. (These dads could be "Promising Optimists.")

B. 27% of the sample had poor extended family support, poor social/skill support, poor self-esteem, moderate parent-child interaction and good parental confidence. (These dads could be termed "Visionary Overcomers.")

C. 36% of the sample had high parent-child interaction, high extended family support, good social/skill support, moderate self-esteem and moderate parental confidence. (These could be termed "Promising Realists.")

D. 14% of the sample had high social/skill support, good self-esteem, moderate extended family support, poor parental confidence and poor parent-child interaction. (These could be termed "Potential Drop-out Dads.")

Depression and Other Feelings

Items which contributed to greater measures of depression since becoming a parent included:

A. Feeling abandoned by their family and friends.

B. Struggle with shame and rejection.

C. My father "doesn't" like me.

D. "Not" discussing my child's growth and progress with the child's other parent.

E. "Not" acquiring the skills necessary to get a good job.

F. "Not" seeing my child more often.

Items which contributed to greater measures of struggle with shame and rejection were:

A. My parents criticize me often.
B. Feeling abandoned by my family and friends.

Interaction with Child and Other Parent

Items which were associated with a good relationship with the child's other parent were:

A. Discussing my child's growth and progress with the other parent.

B. Having relatives whom I can call to help in a difficult situation.

C. Discussing plans I have for my child with the other parent.

Items which contributed to seeing my child more included:

A. Being "less" depressed since becoming a parent.
B. My father likes me.

The two items which discriminated between those received a reduced lunch at school were:

A. Recipients of reduced school lunch had more children.
B. Recipients of reduced school lunch spent less time with their children.

Discussion and Recommendations

Given the scant data available on teen dads, comparative samples from other geographical areas and a large sample of specifically "teen-aged dads" would be useful. But the existing data and analysis from this sample allow some suggestions to be made. Teen dads need to be seen as a diverse group who have widely-differing needs. Of most immediate concern are the small sub-set who have little hope for the future; and the small percentage of respondents who simply didn't want to have contact with their child. While dads like these may not be open to conventional interventions, innovative approaches need to be explored to reach and inspire them.

A further group where programming might bear most results would be the 10% of teen dads (and moms) who sometimes or often don't know what to do with their child. Training could make a dramatic difference here.

The four general types of teen dads which emerged from the data allow better targeting of resources and programming. One group appears to be in less need of assistance, the "Promising Realists," while two groups have motivation but need help in building skills and social support: Visionary Overcomers and Promising Optimists. Many of the "Potential Drop-out Dads" need innovative approaches to provide a spark of motivation for the heritage they can contribute to their child.


What's New Upcoming Events Organizations Research Practice Policy Home
For further information or questions regarding this web site, please email mailbox@ncoff.gse.upenn.edu


NCOFF National Center on Fathers and Families
University of Pennsylvania
Graduate School of Education
3700 Walnut Street, Box 58
Philadelphia, PA 19104-6216
Date Posted: 11/11/97; Date Revised: 11/11/97
http://www.ncoff.gse.upenn.edu/
Fatherlink copyright, (c) 1997 National Center on Fathers and Families