Fatherlink Homepage What's New Upcoming Events Organizations Research Practice Policy Home

Recent Research Reports and News: May 2003

Fathers—Research    |    Children & Families    |     Fatbers/Mothers in Prison    |     Census Data    |     Systemic Barriers    |     Welfare Reform    |     NCOFF Abstracts

Fathers—Research


  • Family Characteristics and Sexual Risk Behaviors Among Black Men in the United States, Rosalie J. Bakken and Mary Winter, Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, Volume 34, Number 5, September/October 2002.

    CONTEXT: Past research indicates that family characteristics are associated with sexual risk-taking behaviors in adolescence and adulthood. Because the prevalence of sexually transmitted diseases is higher among black males than among males of other races, it is important to understand factors associated with sexual risk in this group. METHODS: Data from 1,125 black men participating in the 1991 National Survey of Men were used in structural equation modeling to examine the association of individual and family characteristics with age at sexual initiation and the lifetime number of sexual partners. RESULTS: Men whose mothers worked were likely to have first intercourse at a younger age than others (beta, -.104), whereas those raised by both parents were likely to delay sexual initiation (.072) and to have fewer partners during their lifetime (-.062). Men who were married or had had first intercourse at an older age were likely to have a lower total number of partners than others (-.297 and -.369, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: School and community programs should provide culturally appropriate and accessible activities for black youth, and should reach black males early, while they are still in elementary school. Programming targeted at parents may help them learn skills for communicating effectively with children about sexuality-related issues.

    For a copy of the complete article, visit the Guttmacher Institute web site.

  • Are Married Parents Really Better for Children? What Research Says About the Effects of Family Structure on Child Well-Being, Mary Parke, Couples and Marriage Series Brief No. 3, Center for Law and Social Policy, May 2003.

    CLASP Summary: This brief, the third in a series on Couples and Marriage Research and Policy, summarizes research on the effects of family structure on child well-being, discusses some of the complexities of the research, and identifies issues that remain to be explored. It concludes that research largely supports the notion that, on average, children do best when raised by two married, biological parents who have a low-conflict relationship. However, this new review also finds that discussions of this research are too often oversimplified, which leads to exaggeration by proponents of marriage promotion initiatives and to skepticism from critics.

    To access the full report in PDF format, visit the CLASP web site.

  • Costs and Benefits of Improving Response Rates for a Hard-to-Reach Population," Julien O. Teitler (Columbia Univ.), Nancy E. Reichman (Columbia Univ.), and Susan Sprachman (Mathematica Policy Research, Inc.), Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol., 67, Spring 2003.

    Mathematica Summary: A prevailing assumption in survey research is that the higher the response rate, the more representative the sample. Given real-world budget constraints, it is important to determine whether the benefits of marginal increases in response rates outweigh the costs. At a certain level, other methods of increasing the sample or reducing survey error may be more cost-effective. The authors examine the costs and benefits of increased response rates on the composition of fathers in the Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study, a national longitudinal survey of new parents. They conclude that the characteristics of the sample approached those of the target population as response rates increased, but returns appear to have diminished at very high levels of effort.

    For a copy of the article, visit the Public Opinion Quarterly's web site. (A subscription may be required.)

Fathers and Mothers in Prison


  • Selected Articles: The Prisoner Rehabilitation Authority Philosophy and Programs, Avraham Hoffmann, Director General and founder, State of Israel Prisoner Rehabilitation Authority, Jerusalem, September 2002.

    Preface excerpt:
    Since the creation of the Israeli Prisoner Rehabilitation Authority in 1984, Avraham Hoffmann has been its Director General. He has worked hard to develop a comprehensive system for the rehabilitation of released inmates and their families. Over nearly two decades and with no such precedents, a wide range of programs have been developed, adapted to the different populations needs. Together with an excellent and devoted staff, he worked at promoting the released inmates reintegration into society, as well as disseminating his belief that prisoners can and should be rehabilitated and that the society must be an active partner.

    Hence, it was not easy to gather Avraham Hoffmann’s articles and lectures on the Prisoner Rehabilitation Authority, its unique and innovative programs and his philosophy, in a single book. This book does not intend to assemble all Avraham Hoffmann’s work and ideas, nor gather all his articles, as they are too many. It presents the most recent articles and newly developed programs. Some older articles treat major programs that are mentioned in recent articles but briefly. Other programs, no less important, were omitted; a great deal still wait to be written by Hoffmann.

    This new volume of articles is now available in PDF format from the Family & Corrections Network's web site as part of their Reading Room.

  • New Initiative Aims to Strengthen Community Strategies for Prisoners Returning to Society, The Urban Institute, April 15, 2003.

    Press Release exceprt: The Reentry Mapping Network, a three-year innovative partnership that will help mobilize local leaders and residents to effectively identify and address the challenges of prisoner reentry, kicks off this month with the Urban Institute's selection of the Network's first six partner cities: Des Moines, Iowa; Milwaukee, Wisconsin; Oakland, California; Providence, Rhode Island; Washington, DC; and Winston-Salem, North Carolina. Developed with the support of the Annie E. Casey Foundation, the Network will choose six more cities to join the partnership next year.

    With more than 600,000 prisoners returning to society each year, prisoner reentry poses many challenges to the communities involved, including an increased risk to public safety and a limited availability of jobs, housing, and social services for the returning prisoners. The Network seeks to strengthen communities' capacities to acquire information that will help them better understand and address these challenges.

    Partners will collect and analyze data related to incarceration, community supervision, and indicators of community well-being (e.g., employment, crime, housing, and education). Partners will use the data to pinpoint neighborhoods that experience high concentrations of returning prisoners and examine the extent to which such communities are equipped to address the challenges that prisoner reentry creates. Some partners will also conduct surveys and focus groups to inform the data collection and analysis process. Partners will work with community stakeholders to target intervention efforts and resources where most needed and to help assess their effectiveness.

    Although mapping has been used to effectively address a wide range of criminal justice challenges, until now only a few cities have mapped neighborhood-level incarceration and reentry data. Even fewer cities have attempted to link incarceration and reentry data with other indicators of community well being.

    The cities were chosen through a competitive selection process that examined the feasibility and quality of the proposed research project, its value to the community, and the quality and availability of existing relevant data.

    The first six partner organizations and their primary research topics are:

    • Des Moines, Iowa: The Child and Family Policy Center will examine family reunification and parental responsibility for ex-prisoners and their immediate families. (Contact: Charles Bruner, 515-280-9027)
    • Milwaukee, Wisconsin: Project COMPASS and the Non-Profit Center will identify opportunities to strengthen coordination among service providers for ex-prisoners and their families. (Contact: Jim Pingle, 414-286-3467)
    • Oakland, California: The Urban Strategies Council will help educate and prepare community stakeholders to face the challenges and seize the opportunities that come with reintegrating parolees into the community. (Contact: Junious Williams, 510-893-1376)
    • Providence, Rhode Island: The Providence Plan will examine the effect of ex-offenders' residential mobility on their likelihood of staying out of prison and accessing services, and they will identify strategies for connecting ex-prisoners to community resources. (Contact: Patrick McGuigan, 401-455-8880)
    • Washington, D.C.: DC Agenda will analyze workforce development opportunities and challenges related to ex-prisoners. (Contact: Mark Rubin, 202-223-2598 ext. 16)
    • Winston-Salem, North Carolina: The Center for Community Safety will identify the risks and assets of neighborhoods with high concentrations of ex-prisoners and devise strategies for more effective use of those resources and assets to address the needs of ex-prisoners, their families, and their communities. (Contact: Sylvia Oberle, 336-750-3470)

    For a copy of the complete Press Release, visit the Urban Institute web site.

Children and Families


  • Sexual Intercourse and the Age Difference Between Adolescent Females and Their Romantic Partners, Christine E. Kaestle, Donald E. Morisky and Dorothy J. Wiley, Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, Volume 34, Number 6, November/December 2002.

    CONTEXT: The age difference between a female and her partner may influence relationship dynamics in ways that put the female at increased risk of unintended pregnancies and sexually transmitted diseases. Very little is known, however, about how romantic involvement progresses to intercourse, particularly among adolescent females with older male partners. METHODS: Data from 1,975 female participants in the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health were analyzed using logistic regression to determine whether the age difference between an adolescent female and her romantic partner is a risk factor for sexual intercourse. RESULTS: Adolescent females involved with an older partner have higher odds of having intercourse with that partner than females with partners their own age, after adjustment for demographic covariates. The magnitude of this association is most dramatic among the youngest females--for example, the odds of intercourse among 13-year-old females with a partner six years older are more than six times the odds among 13-year-old females with a same-age partner (odds ratio, 6.4), while 17-year-old females with partners six years older have about twice the odds of intercourse when compared with those who have a same-age partner (2.1). CONCLUSIONS: Young adolescent females with substantially older partners are much more likely than their peers to have sex with their partner, which exposes them to the risks of pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases.

    For a copy of the full study in PDF or HTML format, visit the Alan Guttmacher Institute web site.

Census and Statistical Data


  • Married-Couple and Unmarried-Partner Households: 2000, Tavia Simmons and Martin O'Connell, Census 2000 Special Report, U.S. Census Bureau, February 2003.

    Press Release excerpt (March 13, 2003): The Census Bureau released a Census 2000 report on married- and unmarried-couple households today.

    The 16-page report, Married-Couple and Unmarried-Partner Households: 2000, by Tavia Simmons and Martin O'Connell, marks the first time the Census Bureau has issued a census report on unmarried partners. In 1990, "unmarried partner" was added as an option to the census question on household relationship.

    The report and supplementary tables on the Internet show numbers of married-couple households for 2000, as well as unmarried-partner households consisting of two people of the opposite sex and of two people of the same sex.

    It also shows data on residential and geographical variations in demographic characteristics for the four types of households, such as differences in the sex of the householder (the person in whose name the housing unit was owned or rented), the prevalence of mixed-race couples and partners, as well as differences in the ages of the couples or partners in the various types of households. A color-coded, thematic map of the United States shows the percentages of unmarried- partner households by county.

    For a copy of the complete report and tables in PDF format visit, http://www.census.gov/prod/2003pubs/censr-5.pdf. The supplementary tables are at http://www.census.gov/population/www/cen2000/pio-phc-t19.html .

Systemic Barriers


Welfare Reform


New Citations from NCOFF's FatherLit Database



What's New Upcoming Events Organizations Research Practice Policy Home
For further information or questions regarding this web site, please email mailbox@ncoff.gse.upenn.edu


NCOFF
Updated: January 30, 2004 06:15 pm

http://fatherfamilylink.gse.upenn.edu Father&Familylink

copyright, © 1997 National Center on Fathers and Families/Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania